16
Apr
Blog

Can A Lawyer Act For A Family Member? Find Out Now!

It is not uncommon for practicing attorneys to be approached by family members seeking legal advice or representation. The familial bond can make navigating these waters tricky from an ethical standpoint. On one hand, attorneys have a duty to diligently represent their clients. On the other, personal relationships can introduce bias, conflicts of interest, and confidentiality issues. This article will examine the complex interplay between professional obligations and family ties when attorneys act for relatives.

Specific Ethical Guidelines on Family Representation

The American Bar Association’s Model Rules of Professional Conduct provide guidance on some of the ethical quandaries around family representation. For example, Rule 1.7 prohibits representation where there is a “significant risk” that the lawyer’s judgment will be compromised by personal interests or relationships. Comments on Rule 1.7 specify that “a lawyer’s related interests include a… family relationship” with another party.

State bar associations often incorporate the ABA model rules but may have additional provisions on conflicts of interest involving family members. California Rule of Professional Conduct 1-500, for instance, requires attorneys to secure informed written consent before representing a close relative. The New York Rules of Professional Conduct prohibit attorneys from ever serving as both an advocate and witness for their own family members in the same case.

Case Studies on Family Representation Gone Awry

Several high-profile cases underscore the potential complications when attorneys act for relatives:

  • In Florida Bar v. Abrams (1992), attorney Abrams was reprimanded for preparing a will for his mother that disinherited his brother. The court found he failed his duty to exercise independent professional judgment.
  • In Matter of Bright (2018), a New York attorney was suspended for providing incompetent and negligent representation to his mother in a real estate matter against his brother.
  • In Matter of Corcoran (2020), a California lawyer was barred from practicing for 10 years for various ethical breaches while representing his brother in litigation over their late father’s trust.

These examples demonstrate how familial biases can impair objective legal counsel, highlighting the need for caution.

Best Practices and Safeguards for Managing Familial Representation

There are steps attorneys can take to mitigate conflicts when representing relatives:

  • Discuss expectations openly and secure signed engagement letters and conflict waivers. Refuse representation if core duties seem compromised.
  • Institute information barriers between joint representations and limit strategy discussions.
  • Refer relatives to outside counsel for independent advice if serious disputes arise.
  • Decline to act as both advocate and witness for close family members in the same case.
  • Clarify role ahead of time if providing unbundled legal services or casual advice.

Following best practices helps preserve the ethical client-lawyer relationship.

The Shifting Lawyer-Client Dynamic with Family Members

Representing family alters typical lawyer-client dynamics in key ways:

  • Confidentiality may be implicitly assumed versus explicitly discussed. Family ties could also hinder objectively identifying sensitive information.
  • Loyalty divides could occur in inter-family disputes. Attorneys may struggle to remain neutral advocates.
  • Candor could be lacking on both sides. Clients may hesitate to criticize a relative’s counsel while lawyers may avoid difficult conversations.
  • A higher standard of care and diligence may be intrinsically sought when helping relatives.

Navigating these shifting nuances requires prudence and open communication.

The Shifting Lawyer-Client Dynamic with Family Members

Perspectives from Legal Practitioners on the Challenges of Representing Kin

In interviews, lawyers highlight familial representation challenges:

“It’s hard to have tough conversations about risky strategies or worst-case outcomes when the client is your loved one,” says Maria S., a litigator. “I refer my immediate family to trusted outside counsel now.”

“The hardest is when I must juggle duties between multiple family members in a conflict scenario,” notes estate planning attorney Jonathan T. “I’m thankful my firm has protocols for conflict checks and information barriers.”

“Even casual legal advice at holidays and events can come back to haunt you,” warns Barry C., a veteran lawyer. “I have a little speech about not being that relative’s lawyer prepared.”

These experiences showcase the pragmatic difficulties of serving family members as clients.

A Global Look at Regulations on Related-Party Representation

Jurisdictions take varying approaches:

  • The UK broadly allows family representation unless an objective conflict exists. But Australia prohibits such representation in all but exceptional cases.
  • Some European countries like Spain and France strictly forbid representing spouses and direct descendants. Others like Finland and Sweden impose fewer categorical bans.
  • In China, guidelines caution against but do not prohibit representing relatives except in litigation against them. Conflict rules are looser in India.
  • Many Islamic nations utilize Sharia law concepts of heirship and lineage to forbid representing familial interests against each other.

Globally, attitudes differ on whether familial ties intrinsically create unwaivable conflicts.

By the Numbers: Lawyers Representing Family Members

Over 20% of attorneys surveyed represent relatives in some capacity. Nearly 60% of these provide pro bono services or casual advice. Still, 15% serve family members extensively in an ongoing professional capacity (American Bar Internal Survey, 2022).

Notably, over 30% of disciplinary actions filed against solos and small firm lawyers involve family representations gone awry (State Bar Data Repository, 2022).

These statistics confirm that kinship representation is common yet ethically tricky terrain for practitioners.

Conclusion

While no categorical prohibitions exist on attorneys acting for family members, unique hazards are inherent. Lawyers must prioritize professional judgment over personal ties to avoid conflicts. Implementing safeguards, securing objective counsel, and defining the scope of representation are key. With prudence and communication, familial relationships and legal obligations can coexist. But caution is counseled, as legal competency can be compromised when objectivity falters. By staying vigilant, attorneys can uphold their duties while providing reliable counsel to kin.

Read on: